Note
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try signing in or changing directories.
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try changing directories.
Overview
LLM judges enable you to evaluate and monitor your GenAI applications using MLflow Traces. These judges are a type of MLflow Scorer that leverages Large Language Models for nuanced quality assessment, complementing code-based scorers that handle deterministic metrics.
:::important When to use which scorer: When to use code-based scorers:
- Deterministic metrics (latency, token usage)
- Rule-based validations (format checks, pattern matching)
- Business logic (price calculations, threshold checks)
When to use LLM judges:
- Quality assessments (correctness, coherence, relevance)
- Safety evaluations (toxicity, harmful content)
- Complex evaluations requiring deep understanding of text, audio, images, or video content :::
Built-in LLM Judges
MLflow provides built-in, research-backed LLM judges to assess traces across essential quality dimensions.
Important
Start with built-in judges for quick evaluation. As your needs evolve:
- Build custom LLM judges for domain-specific criteria
- Create custom code-based scorers for deterministic business logic
How built-in judges work
Once passed a Trace by either evaluate() or the monitoring service, the built-in judge:
- Parses the
traceto extract specific fields and data that are used to assess quality - Calls an LLM to perform the quality assessment based on the extracted fields and data
- Returns the quality assessment as
Feedbackto attach to thetrace
Prerequisites
Run the following command to install MLflow 3.0 and OpenAI packages.
pip install --upgrade "mlflow[databricks]>=3.4.0" openaiFollow the tracing quickstart to connect your development environment to an MLflow Experiment.
Step 1: Create a sample application to evaluate
Define a simple application with a fake retriever.
Initialize an OpenAI client to connect to either Databricks-hosted LLMs or LLMs hosted by OpenAI.
Databricks-hosted LLMs
Use MLflow to get an OpenAI client that connects to Databricks-hosted LLMs. Select a model from the available foundation models.
import mlflow from databricks.sdk import WorkspaceClient # Enable MLflow's autologging to instrument your application with Tracing mlflow.openai.autolog() # Set up MLflow tracking to Databricks mlflow.set_tracking_uri("databricks") mlflow.set_experiment("/Shared/docs-demo") # Create an OpenAI client that is connected to Databricks-hosted LLMs w = WorkspaceClient() client = w.serving_endpoints.get_open_ai_client() # Select an LLM model_name = "databricks-claude-sonnet-4"OpenAI-hosted LLMs
Use the native OpenAI SDK to connect to OpenAI-hosted models. Select a model from the available OpenAI models.
import mlflow import os import openai # Ensure your OPENAI_API_KEY is set in your environment # os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"] = "<YOUR_API_KEY>" # Uncomment and set if not globally configured # Enable auto-tracing for OpenAI mlflow.openai.autolog() # Set up MLflow tracking to Databricks mlflow.set_tracking_uri("databricks") mlflow.set_experiment("/Shared/docs-demo") # Create an OpenAI client connected to OpenAI SDKs client = openai.OpenAI() # Select an LLM model_name = "gpt-4o-mini"Define the application:
from mlflow.entities import Document from typing import List # Retriever function called by the sample app @mlflow.trace(span_type="RETRIEVER") def retrieve_docs(query: str) -> List[Document]: return [ Document( id="sql_doc_1", page_content="SELECT is a fundamental SQL command used to retrieve data from a database. You can specify columns and use a WHERE clause to filter results.", metadata={"doc_uri": "http://example.com/sql/select_statement"}, ), Document( id="sql_doc_2", page_content="JOIN clauses in SQL are used to combine rows from two or more tables, based on a related column between them. Common types include INNER JOIN, LEFT JOIN, and RIGHT JOIN.", metadata={"doc_uri": "http://example.com/sql/join_clauses"}, ), Document( id="sql_doc_3", page_content="Aggregate functions in SQL, such as COUNT(), SUM(), AVG(), MIN(), and MAX(), perform calculations on a set of values and return a single summary value. The most common aggregate function in SQL is COUNT().", metadata={"doc_uri": "http://example.com/sql/aggregate_functions"}, ), ] # Sample app to evaluate @mlflow.trace def sample_app(query: str): # 1. Retrieve documents based on the query retrieved_documents = retrieve_docs(query=query) retrieved_docs_text = "\n".join([doc.page_content for doc in retrieved_documents]) # 2. Prepare messages for the LLM messages_for_llm = [ { "role": "system", # Fake prompt to show how the various judges identify quality issues. "content": f"Answer the user's question based on the following retrieved context: {retrieved_docs_text}. Do not mention the fact that provided context exists in your answer. If the context is not relevant to the question, generate the best response you can.", }, { "role": "user", "content": query, }, ] # 3. Call LLM to generate the response return client.chat.completions.create( # Provide a valid model name for your LLM provider. model=model_name, messages=messages_for_llm, ) result = sample_app("what is select in sql?") print(result)
Step 2: Create a sample evaluation dataset
Note
expected_facts is only required if you use built-in judges that require ground-truth.
eval_dataset = [
{
"inputs": {"query": "What is the most common aggregate function in SQL?"},
"expectations": {
"expected_facts": ["Most common aggregate function in SQL is COUNT()."],
},
},
{
"inputs": {"query": "How do I use MLflow?"},
"expectations": {
"expected_facts": [
"MLflow is a tool for managing and tracking machine learning experiments."
],
},
},
]
print(eval_dataset)
Step 3: Run evaluation with built-in LLM judges
Now, let's run the evaluation with the judges we defined above.
from mlflow.genai.scorers import (
Correctness,
ExpectationsGuidelines,
Guidelines,
RelevanceToQuery,
RetrievalGroundedness,
RetrievalRelevance,
RetrievalSufficiency,
Safety,
)
# Run built-in judges that require ground truth
mlflow.genai.evaluate(
data=eval_dataset,
predict_fn=sample_app,
scorers=[
Correctness(),
# RelevanceToQuery(),
# RetrievalGroundedness(),
# RetrievalRelevance(),
RetrievalSufficiency(),
# Safety(),
],
)
# Run built-in judges that do NOT require ground truth
mlflow.genai.evaluate(
data=eval_dataset,
predict_fn=sample_app,
scorers=[
# Correctness(),
RelevanceToQuery(),
RetrievalGroundedness(),
RetrievalRelevance(),
# RetrievalSufficiency(),
Safety(),
Guidelines(name="does_not_mention", guidelines="The response not mention the fact that provided context exists.")
],
)


Available judges
By default, each judge uses a Databricks-hosted LLM designed to perform GenAI quality assessments. You can change the judge model by using the model argument in the judge definition. The model must be specified in the format <provider>:/<model-name>. For example:
from mlflow.genai.scorers import Correctness
Correctness(model="databricks:/databricks-gpt-5-mini")
For a list of supported models, see the MLflow documentation.
| Judge | What it evaluates? | Requires ground-truth? |
|---|---|---|
RelevanceToQuery |
Does app's response directly address the user's input? | No |
Safety |
Does the app's response avoid harmful or toxic content? | No |
RetrievalGroundedness |
Is the app's response grounded in retrieved information? | No |
RetrievalRelevance |
Are retrieved documents relevant to the user's request? | No |
Correctness |
Is app's response correct compared to ground-truth? | Yes |
RetrievalSufficiency |
Do retrieved documents contain all necessary information? | Yes |
Guidelines |
Does the app's response meet specified criteria? | No |
ExpectationsGuidelines |
Does the app's response meet per-example criteria? | No |
Information about the models powering LLM judges
- LLM judges might use third-party services to evaluate your GenAI applications, including Azure OpenAI operated by Microsoft.
- For Azure OpenAI, Databricks has opted out of Abuse Monitoring so no prompts or responses are stored with Azure OpenAI.
- For European Union (EU) workspaces, LLM judges use models hosted in the EU. All other regions use models hosted in the US.
- Disabling Partner-powered AI features prevents the LLM judge from calling partner-powered models. You can still use LLM judges by providing your own model.
- LLM judges are intended to help customers evaluate their GenAI agents/applications, and LLM judge outputs should not be used to train, improve, or fine-tune an LLM.
Next steps
Continue your journey with these recommended actions and tutorials.
- Create custom scorers - Build code-based metrics for your specific needs
- Create custom LLM scorers - Design sophisticated evaluation criteria using LLMs
- Evaluate your app - See built-in judges in action with a complete example
Reference guides
Explore detailed documentation for concepts and features mentioned in this guide.
- Prebuilt judges & scorers reference - Comprehensive overview of all available judges
- Scorers - Understand how scorers work and their role in evaluation
- LLM judges - Learn about the underlying judge architecture