Hi ,
Thanks for reaching out to Microsoft Q&A.
If you are only using serverless SQL pool and serverless spark pool, then having one or two synapse workspaces does not materially affect cost.
Costs are primarily based on usage (queries, data processed, spark compute time), not the no of workspaces.
However, multiple workspaces can add small overheads such as:
Separate Spark pool metadata and job history management.
Slightly higher operational complexity and potential duplicate configurations (linked services, permissions, etc.).
So, no direct cost savings from consolidating workspaces, but simpler governance and management favour a single workspace unless you have strong isolation or access control needs.
Please 'Upvote'(Thumbs-up) and 'Accept' as answer if the reply was helpful. This will be benefitting other community members who face the same issue.