Share via

Logical inconsistency in AVS Interconnect connectivity example

Ali El Husseiny 100 Reputation points
2025-07-02T09:17:19.1066667+00:00

Logical explanation type was found at : https://free.blessedness.top/en-us/azure/azure-vmware/connect-multiple-private-clouds-same-region

When describing interconnect between 3 AVS description includes a logic error.

It says: “If private cloud A is connected to private cloud B, and private cloud B is connected to private cloud C, private clouds A and B wouldn’t communicate until they were directly connected.”

This is incorrect — since A and B are directly connected, they should be able to communicate.

I believe the correct phrasing should be:

“If private cloud A is connected to private cloud B, and private cloud B is connected to private cloud C, private clouds A and C wouldn’t be able to communicate until they were directly connected.”

This would properly reflect the non-transitive nature of AVS Interconnect.

Azure VMware Solution
Answer accepted by question author
  1. Anusree Nashetty 6,395 Reputation points Microsoft External Staff Moderator
    2025-07-24T07:38:02.46+00:00

    Hi Ali El Husseiny,

    We sincerely appreciate your time and effort in bringing this to our attention. Your feedback is valuable in helping us improve our documentation and ensure clarity for all users.

    Based on your input, we have reviewed and updated the content as follows:

    Before: “If private cloud A is connected to private cloud B, and private cloud B is connected to private cloud C, private clouds A and B wouldn’t communicate until they were directly connected.”

    After modification: “For example, if private cloud A is connected to private cloud B, and private cloud B is connected to private cloud C, private clouds A and C wouldn't communicate until they were directly connected.”

    Thank you once again for your thoughtful contribution.

    Document link: Connect multiple Azure VMware Solution private clouds in the same region

    If the information is helpful, please click on Upvote and Accept Answer on it.

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments

1 additional answer

Sort by: Most helpful
Most helpful Newest Oldest
  1. Anusree Nashetty 6,395 Reputation points Microsoft External Staff Moderator
    2025-07-03T21:04:30.1133333+00:00

    Hi Ali El Husseiny,

    You're absolutely right — your observation highlights a clear logical inconsistency in the documentation statement.

    You can submit a GitHub feedback issue or use the “This page” feedback button at the bottom of the Microsoft Docs page to report this and include your corrected sentence. Microsoft Docs maintainers usually respond quickly to logical errors like this.

    You can select Out of date/obsolete or Other option and fill out the information then submit it. You can also Provide product feedback

    If you have any further queries, let me know. If the information is helpful, please click on Upvote and Accept Answer on it.

Your answer

Answers can be marked as 'Accepted' by the question author and 'Recommended' by moderators, which helps users know the answer solved the author's problem.