Note
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try signing in or changing directories.
Access to this page requires authorization. You can try changing directories.
The two ActivatorUtilities.CreateInstance methods now throw an ArgumentNullException exception if the provider parameter is null.
Version introduced
.NET 8 Preview 1
Previous behavior
A null value was allowed for the provider parameter. In some cases, the specified type was still created correctly.
New behavior
When provider is null, an ArgumentNullException exception is thrown.
Type of breaking change
This change is a behavioral change.
Reason for change
We fixed the parameter validation along with constructor-matching issues to align with the intended purpose of CreateInstance. The CreateInstance() methods have a non-nullable provider parameter, so it was generally expected that a null provider wasn't allowed.
Recommended action
Pass a non-null IServiceProvider for the provider argument. If the provider also implements IServiceProviderIsService, constructor arguments can be obtained through that.
Alternatively, if your scenario doesn't require dependency injection, since IServiceProvider is null, use Activator.CreateInstance instead.
Affected APIs
- Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.ActivatorUtilities.CreateInstance<T>(IServiceProvider, Object[])
- Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.ActivatorUtilities.CreateInstance(IServiceProvider, Type, Object[])
See also
Collaborate with us on GitHub
The source for this content can be found on GitHub, where you can also create and review issues and pull requests. For more information, see our contributor guide.
